Book - Customer Review:6
Heard on the Street: Quantitative Questions from Wall Street Job Interviews
Timothy Falcon Crack
Rating: 4.0/5 Stars
Rank: 9807
A Waste of Money (USA) January 14, 2005 - 1.0/5 stars
This book was terrible - completely amateurish. You could find the same
(and better) information freely available on the internet.
In the chapter
on programming he has a few trivial questions and then states that he
doesn't know anything about programming so there will be no explanations
for these problems.
I'm paying for this? The book is also sprinkled with
annoying annecdotes that have little to with the topic of the book.
Stay
away!
Customer Review: 6 of 6
Customer Reviews
Heard on the Street: Quantitative Questions from Wall Street Job Interviews
Timothy Falcon Crack
Customer Review
4 - 6 of 6
![]() | | 4. | a quant trader | | (armonk, NY USA) December 30, 2004 - 5.0/5 stars | | I recently interviewed other 30 wall street firms. I am so upset that: a. I
found a lot of questions which put me away from some great places are
coming from this book. b. To ask these standarized question will... read full review |
![]() | | 5. | too old | | (NY) March 30, 2005 - 2.0/5 stars | | I bought this book one month ago from Amazon. Although the newest version,
I think it is too old for today's interview. The questions in my
interviews are not similar as those in the book and much harder. Actually,
I don't... read full review |
![]() | | Current Review | | 6. | A Waste of Money | | (USA) January 14, 2005 - 1.0/5 stars | | This book was terrible - completely amateurish. You could find the same
(and better) information freely available on the internet. In the chapter
on programming he has a few trivial questions and then states that he
doesn't... read full review |
Editorials
Heard on the Street: Quantitative Questions from Wall Street Job Interviews
Timothy Falcon Crack
No editorials are available at this time for
Heard on the Street: Quantitative Questions from Wall Street Job Interviews by Timothy Falcon Crack
Please check back later. |
|